🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has become part of the growing list of performers who voice skepticism about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, explaining she chose not to use their assistance while filming her latest project Die My Love.

Understanding the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

On-set intimacy professionals were introduced following the #MeToo era to guarantee the security and comfort of performers during scenes involving partial undress and intimate moments. Yet, several prominent performers including Jennifer Aniston and Sean Bean have voiced concerns about their presence, with some claiming they disrupt artistic process.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

In conversation on the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her new film where she portrays a woman experiencing postpartum disturbance, the actress stated: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we had the option but didn't really utilize them... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She elaborated: "He is not pervy and very committed to his partner. Our conversations mostly focused on family life and personal connections. There was absolutely no awkward tension or questions about personal boundaries."

"Had there been even a hint of unease, I would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Many male performers take offense if you don't reciprocate their attention, and subsequently the retaliation starts. He was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Earlier this week, entertainment database IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, together with eleven other crew positions including choreography, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" instead of having their specific credit.

Notwithstanding this validation, these professionals continue to face media scrutiny implying they might not be industry essential, with high-profile performers declining their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she declined intimacy coordination while working with Jon Hamm on their television series.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be such a gentleman – I mean each action, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she recalled. "It was also carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had Mimi present."

Additional Cases and Professional Response

Although including multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, Anora – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning project about a adult entertainer and a wealthy heir – proceeded without an on-set professional.

The film's star explained she and co-star her screen partner "concluded it would be best to keep it small."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied the director's work and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was mentally prepared for it. As an actress, I approached it as professional work."

Her comments provoked strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the reaction to another actress's recent comments, who earlier this year revealed that filming her new movie Marty Supreme marked her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about personal ease with a particular action alongside fellow actor her younger counterpart, Paltrow responded: "I'm from the era where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the camera's on."

Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then told the professional: "We believe we're good. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, extremely restricted by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, industry executive an experienced producer described them as "irresponsible" and pointed out that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to command their own power and protection on production locations.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she came of age in a time when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a actor considerably junior than her, although likely Chalamet is comfortable, I considered it somewhat concerning remark."

Actor's Viewpoint

Michael Douglas, meanwhile, shared that he feels the main obligation during intimate sequences falls on the male performer, rather than a external professional.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the man to ensure the woman is comfortable, you talk through thoroughly," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what authentic performance looks like."